September 11th marks the day when all nations around the globe decided to join together in combating terrorism.
With the released findings stating that terrorists hijacked a few airplanes and crashed them into the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. Around the world, many were so shocked by this, that a terrorist attack would ensue on American soil. With all the outrage, there want in so much disbelief that a tragedy like this could happen under the nose of the government, and things don’t add up.
The old meme “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams” has fiction and truth within it; no, jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, but it can, however, reduce the structural integrity of the steel. This is the first in history when a fire successfully brought down three high rises all in the same time span. To give you a little perspective on whats wrong with all this, listen to the video below that has a controlled demolitions expert explaining this:
Even if you disagree with the evidence, there are plenty of more people still searching for the answers behind what happened that fateful day. What many are finding isn’t nice. In the European Scientific journal, an article published titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High Rise Building Collapses” where engineers and scientists analyzed the three buildings collapse.
It was discovered by them, that it would be impossible for these buildings to collapse the way they did without a controlled demolition in place. This news helps clarify the thrasher theories, yet the problem is mostly the evidence was destroyed already— it’s too clean for terrorists.
The study was written and collaborated with Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti, Steven Jones and Ted Walter- whom have prestigious degrees from top notch universities, in their field. As if the science behind it isn’t enough to make you question the attacks on that horrible day, then at least take it from lead structural engineer John Skilling.
We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much. Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane)would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed.
The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.
Back in 1993, the Seattle Times reported that there was a conducted analysis of the towers years ago in the case it would be crashed into by a Boeing 707. With this in mind, the authors of the 9/11 study had to say this:
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.
It is becoming very clear that our government has a different agenda that is outside of our needs, and this evidence is hard to tell if its damning or blatant evidence of the new awful reality we live in.